When you're trying to make a decision, gathering information feels responsible. You read about it. You ask people you trust. You look for someone who's been through something similar.
All of that can be genuinely useful. The problem is when it becomes a way of avoiding your own perspective rather than informing it.
Here's a hypothetical example. Say you're trying to decide whether to leave a job that pays well but has been draining you for two years. You ask a friend who says stay for the stability. You ask another who says life is short, go. You read three articles with conflicting advice. You feel less clear than when you started.
The issue isn't that you asked the wrong people. It's that no one else has access to the full picture of what this job has actually been like for you, what you value, or what you're willing to trade.
Three questions that can help:
"What do I know from my own experience?" Not what you're certain of, just what you've actually observed. In the job example: you've noticed you're tired on Sunday evenings. You've noticed the work stopped feeling interesting about a year ago. Those are real data points.
"What information am I still missing?" Some things genuinely need more facts before you can decide. Separating those from the things you already know enough about can make the decision feel less overwhelming.
"What would I prefer if I weren't trying to satisfy everyone?" This one is worth sitting with. Sometimes the answer surprises you.
This isn't about ignoring good advice or pretending you have all the answers. It's about recognizing that your own experience and preferences are also relevant information, not just noise to be overridden by more authoritative sources.
If you find that self-trust is something you'd like to explore more, life coaching can be a useful space for that kind of reflection.
Work With Julie
Ready to take the next step? Start with a free discovery session.